Tag Archives: Diabetes

How bacteria evolve resistance to antibiotics

Bacteria can rapidly evolve resistance to antibiotics by adapting special pumps to flush them out of their cells, according to new research from the Quadram Institute and University of East Anglia.

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem of global significance. The rise of resistant “superbugs” threatens our ability to use antimicrobials like antibiotics to treat and prevent the spread of infections caused by microorganisms.

It is hoped that the findings will improve how antibiotics are used to help prevent further spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Prof Mark Webber UEA’s Norwich Medical School, and the Quadram Institute, said: “Knowing the details of the mechanisms bacteria develop to become resistant is a key step to understanding antimicrobial resistance. We hope that this kind of work to understand when and how resistance emerges can help us use antibiotics better to minimise selection of resistance.”

The team studied how exposure to antimicrobials leads to the emergence of resistance.

Broadly, superbugs’ defences against antibiotics involve inactivating or evading drugs, stop them getting into their cells, or getting them out of their cells before they can have any effect. But exactly how they do this is still being worked out.

In this new study Dr Eleftheria Trampari from QI, Prof Webber, and colleagues recreated the evolutionary stresses that lead to antimicrobial resistance by exposing Salmonella bacteria to two different antibiotics.

The bacteria were allowed to grow and reproduce in two different states that mimic how they live in the environment.

Some were planktonic — floating in a liquid broth — but others were in biofilms. Bacteria form biofilms on surfaces, as a way of protecting themselves against stresses and most bacteria in the real world exist in a biofilm.

Hundreds of generations of bacteria were grown and exposed to the antibiotics, and in this evolution simulation, survival of the fittest selected those bacteria best adapted to cope with the presence of the antibiotics.

To identify how these ‘winners’ had become resistant, the researchers sequenced the genomes of the resistant bacteria, to identify which genes had changed compared to their non-resistant ancestors.

They found that both antibiotics selected different mutations in a molecular pump that Salmonella uses to get rid of toxic compounds from inside its cells. With colleagues from the University of Essex and University of Cagliari, they found that these two different changes altered how the pump worked in totally different ways. One made it easier for the pumps to catch drugs, the other made it easier for drugs to slide through the pump.

A search of a databases of genomes of Salmonella isolates found that one of these mutations has also arisen multiple times in the real world, in Salmonella from patients, livestock and food in the UK, US and EU, as far back as 2003.

The findings confirm a primary role for these pumps as the first line of defence against antimicrobials.

“This work simulates what happens in the real world where bacteria are constantly exposed to varying concentrations of antimicrobials” said Dr Eleftheria Trampari from the Quadram Institute and first author on the study. “Studying how resistant strains emerge and predict which drugs they will not respond to can be helpful in developing diagnostics and treatment strategies.”

The study was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, part of UKRI.

  • Eleftheria Trampari, Filippo Prischi, Attilio V. Vargiu, Justin Abi-Assaf, Vassiliy N. Bavro, Mark A. Webber. Functionally distinct mutations within AcrB underpin antibiotic resistance in different lifestyles. npj Antimicrobials and Resistance, 2023; 1 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s44259-023-00001-8
  • University of East Anglia

    A novel approach to quantify personal information contained within gut metagenome data

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileTopLeaderboard) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-top-leaderboard’); });
    }

    In a recent study published in Nature Microbiology, researchers used shotgun sequencing to extract human reads from deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in fecal samples of 343 Japanese individuals comprising the main dataset of this study.

    They used this gut metagenome data to reconstruct personal information. Some study participants also provided whole genome sequencing (WGS) data for ultra-deep metagenome shotgun sequencing analysis.

    Study: Reconstruction of the personal information from human genome reads in gut metagenome sequencing data. Image Credit: KaterynaKon/Shutterstock.comStudy: Reconstruction of the personal information from human genome reads in gut metagenome sequencing data. Image Credit: KaterynaKon/Shutterstock.com

    Background

    The knowledge regarding the human microbiome, microorganisms inhabiting the human body, has expanded considerably in the last ten years, thanks to rapid advancements in technologies like metagenome shotgun sequencing.

    This technology allows the sequencing of the non-bacterial component of the microbiome samples, including host DNA. For instance, in fecal samples, the amount of host DNA is less than 10% but is removed to protect the privacy of donors.

    Human germline genotype in metagenome data is substantial to enable the re-identification of individuals. However, researchers and donors should recognize that it is highly confidential, so sharing it with the community requires careful consideration.

    Apart from ethical concerns related to sharing this data, it is necessary to understand that if human reads in metagenome data are not removed before deposition, what kind of personal information (e.g., sex and ancestry) could this data help recover?

    In addition, human reads in gut metagenome data could be a good resource for stool-based forensics, robust variant calling, and polygenic risk scores based estimates of disease risks (e.g., type 2 diabetes).

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileMiddleMrec) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-middle-mrec’); });
    }

    Since this data could help quantitatively and precisely reconstruct genotype information, it could complement human WGS data.

    About the study

    In the present study, researchers applied a few humans reads in the gut metagenome data of the main study dataset to reconstruct personal information, including genetic sex and ancestry. For predicting genetic sex and the ancestries of these 343 individuals, they used sequencing depth of the sex chromosomes and modified likelihood score-based method, respectively.

    In addition, the researchers developed methods to re-identify a person from a genotype dataset. Furthermore, they combined two harmonized genotype-calling approaches, the direct calling of rare variants and the two-step imputation of common variants, to reconstruct genotypes.

    The main dataset of the study included 343 Japanese participants, whereas the validation dataset for the genetic sex prediction analysis comprised 113 Japanese individuals.

    The multi-ancestry dataset, which helped the researchers validate ancestry prediction analysis, comprised 73 individuals of various nationalities, including samples from individuals in New Delhi, India.

    The female and male participants in each dataset were 196 & 147, 65 & 48, and 25 & 48, respectively. Likewise, the age range for these three datasets was 20 to 88, 20 to 81, and 20 to 61 years, respectively.

    Results and conclusion

    Given that human reads in the gut metagenome data were derived consistently from all chromosomes, the read depth of the X chromosome was nearly double in females and that of the Y chromosome in males.

    So, in a logistic regression analysis, when the researchers applied a 0.43 Y:X chromosome read-depth ratio to the validation dataset, which correctly predicted the genetic sex of 97.3% of the study samples.

    In human microbiome and genetic research, the feasibility of sex prediction using human gut metagenome data could help remove mislabelled samples.

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileBottomMrec) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-bottom-mrec’); });
    }

    The study analysis also helped researchers remarkably predict ancestry in 98.3% of individuals using 1,000 Genomes Project (1KG) data as a reference.

    However, the likelihood score-based method often misclassified South Asian (SAS) samples as American (AMR) and European (EUR), especially when the number of human reads was small. It is understandable because the genetic diversity of the SAS population is complex.

    The likelihood score-based method also efficiently utilized the data from genomic areas with low coverage demonstrating the quantitative power of gut metagenome data to re-identify individuals and successfully re-identified 93.3% of individuals.

    Despite ethical concerns, the re-identification method used in this study could help in the quality control of multi-omics datasets comprising gut metagenome and human germline genotype data.

    In addition, the authors successfully reconstructed genome-wide common variants using genomic approaches. Historically researchers used stool samples as a source of germline genomes for wild and domestic animals but not humans.

    Thus, further development of suitable methodologies could help efficiently utilize the human genome in gut metagenome data and benefit animal research.

    Nonetheless, the study remarkably demonstrated that optimized methods could help reconstruct personal information from the human reads in gut metagenome data.

    Moreover, the findings of this study could serve as a guiding resource to devise best practices for using the already accumulated gut metagenome data of humans.

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileBottomLeaderboard) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-bottom-leaderboard’); });
    }

    Journal reference:

    Revolutionizing Disease Detection: Breathalyzer Sniffs Out COVID-19 and More

    Each time we breathe out, we release over 1,000 unique molecules that create a specific “breathprint,” a chemical signature that provides valuable insights into our body’s internal conditions.

    For years, researchers have been trying to tap into this wealth of information, utilizing the keen sense of smell in dogs, rats, and even bees to detect diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and tuberculosis.

    Scientists from CU Boulder and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have made an important leap forward in the quest to diagnose disease using exhaled breath, reporting that a new laser-based breathalyzer powered by artificial intelligence (AI) can detect COVID-19 in real-time with excellent accuracy.

    The results were recently published in the Journal of Breath Research.

    “Our results demonstrate the promise of breath analysis as an alternative, rapid, non-invasive test for COVID-19 and highlight its remarkable potential for diagnosing diverse conditions and disease states,” said first author Qizhong Liang, a Ph.D. candidate in JILA and the Department of Physics at CU Boulder. JILA is a partnership between CU Boulder and NIST.

    The multidisciplinary team of physicists, biochemists, and biologists is now shifting its focus to a wide range of other diseases in hopes that the “frequency comb breathalyzer”—born of Nobel Prize-winning technology from CU—could revolutionize medical diagnostics.

    “There is a real, foreseeable future in which you could go to the doctor and have your breath measured along with your height and weight…Or you could blow into a mouthpiece integrated into your phone and get information about your health in real-time,” said senior author Jun Ye, a JILA fellow and adjoint professor of physics at CU Boulder. “The potential is endless.”

    As far back as 2008, Ye’s lab reported that a technique called frequency comb spectroscopy—essentially using laser light to distinguish one molecule from another—could potentially identify biomarkers of disease in human breath.

    The technology lacked sensitivity and, more importantly, the capability to link specific molecules to disease states, so they never tested it for diagnosing illness.

    But Ye’s team has since improved the sensitivity a thousandfold, enabling the detection of trace molecules at the parts-per-trillion level. They’ve also harnessed the power of AI.

    “Molecules increase or decrease in concentrations when associated with specific health conditions,” said Liang. “Machine learning analyzes this information, identifies patterns, and develops criteria we can use to predict a diagnosis.”

    With SARS-CoV-2 ripping across the country and frustration mounting about long response times for existing tests, the time had come to test the system on people. As a physicist, Ye had never worked with human subjects, so he enlisted help from CU’s BioFrontiers Institute, an interdisciplinary hub for biomedical research that was heading up the campus COVID testing program.

    The National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health funded the research.

    Between May 2021 and January 2022, the research team collected breath samples from 170 CU Boulder students who had, in the previous 48 hours, taken a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, either by submitting a saliva or a nasal sample.

    Half had tested positive, half negative. (For safety reasons, volunteer participants came to an outdoor campus parking lot, blew in a sample-collection bag, and left it for a lab tech waiting at a safe distance.)

    Overall, the process took less than one hour from collection to result.

    When compared to PCR, the gold standard COVID test, breathalyzer results matched 85% of the time. For medical diagnostics, an accuracy of 80% or greater is considered “excellent.”

    The researchers suspect that the accuracy would likely have been higher if the breath and saliva/nasal swab samples were collected at the same time.

    Unlike a nasal swab, the breathalyzer is non-invasive. And unlike a saliva sample, users are not asked to refrain from eating, drinking, or smoking before using it. It doesn’t require costly chemicals to break down the sample. And the new test could, conceivably, be used on individuals who are not conscious.

    But there is still much to be learned, said Ye.

    “With one breath, we can collect so many data points from you, but then what? We only understand how a few molecules correlate with specific conditions,” Ye said.

    Today, the “breathalyzer” consists of a complex array of lasers and mirrors about the size of a banquet table.

    A breath sample is piped in through a tube as lasers fire invisible mid-infrared light at it at thousands of different frequencies. Dozens of tiny mirrors bounce the light back and forth through the molecules so many times that in the end, the light travels about 1.5 miles.

    Because each kind of molecule absorbs light differently, breath samples with a different molecular make-up cast distinct shadows. The machine can distinguish between those different shadows or absorption patterns, boiling millions of data points down to—in the case of COVID—a simple positive or negative, in a matter of seconds.

    Efforts are already underway to miniaturize such systems to a chip scale, allowing for what Liang imagines as “real-time, self-health monitoring on the go.” The potential does not end there.

    “What if you could find a signature in breath that could detect pancreatic cancer before you were even symptomatic. That would be the home run,” said molecular biologist and co-author Leslie Leinwand, chief scientific officer for BioFrontiers and a co-author on the study

    Elsewhere, scientists are working to develop a Human Breath Atlas, which maps each molecule in the human exhale and correlates them with health outcomes. Liang hopes to contribute to such efforts with a larger-scale collection of breath samples.

    Meanwhile, the team is collaborating with pediatric and respiratory specialists at the CU Anschutz Medical Campus to explore how the breathalyzer can not only diagnose diseases but also enable scientists to better understand them, offering hints about immune responses, nutritional deficiencies, and other factors that could contribute to or exacerbate illness.

    “If you think about dogs, they evolved over thousands of years to smell many different things with remarkable sensitivity,” said Ye. “We are just at the very beginning of training our laser-based nose. The more we teach it, the smarter it will become.”

    Reference: “Breath analysis by ultra-sensitive broadband laser spectroscopy detects SARS-CoV-2 infection” by Qizhong Liang, Ya-Chu Chan, Jutta Toscano, Kristen K Bjorkman, Leslie A Leinwand, Roy Parker, Eva S Nozik, David J Nesbitt and Jun Ye, 5 April 2023, Journal of Breath Research.
    DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/acc6e4

    The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.

    Diet has a much stronger impact on intestinal microbiota than defensins

    Researchers at Umeå University, Sweden, have found that among the many factors that shape the intestinal microbiota composition, diet has a much stronger impact than defensins, which are intestinal defence molecules produced by the body. Instead, they identified a possible role for these molecules in preventing increased blood glucose levels after consumption of high-caloric “Western-style diet”.

    While the effect of defensins in shaping the adult microbiota composition is rather minor when compared to diet, defensins still have a very important role in protecting us against microbial infections; and our research highlights their protective role against the metabolic complications that can arise after the intake of a high-fat and high-sugar Western-style diet.”

    Fabiola Puértolas Balint, PhD Student at the Department of Molecular Biology at Umeå University

    She is working in Björn Schröder’s research group, which is also affiliated to Umeå Centre of Microbial Research, UCMR, and The Laboratory for Molecular Infection Medicine Sweden, MIMS, at Umeå University.

    The gut microbiota refers to the community of trillions of microorganisms that live inside everyone’s gut. Over the past decades, the abundance of specific bacteria in this community has been extensively studied due to its connection to many diseases, including inflammatory bowel diseases, obesity and diabetes, and even psychological disorders. The microbial community is seeded during birth, after which several internal and external factors help shaping the community to its final composition. These factors include, among others, diet (especially fibre), genetics, medication, exercise, and defence molecules, the so-called antimicrobial peptides.

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileMiddleMrec) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-middle-mrec’); });
    }

    Antimicrobial peptides can be regarded as the body´s own naturally produced antibiotic molecules. In particular, the largest group of antimicrobial peptides – the defensins – is produced by all body surfaces, including the skin, the lungs and the gastrointestinal tract. Defensins are considered the immune system´s first line of defence against infections but at the same time they have also been thought to be essential in shaping the microbiota composition in the small intestine. However, it was so far unclear how big their effect was as compared to diet, which is known to have a major impact.

    To investigate this, the researchers from Björn Schröder lab used normal healthy mice and compared their microbiota composition in the small intestine to mice that could not produce functional defensins in the gut, and then both mouse groups were fed either a healthy diet or a low-fibre Western-style diet.
    “When we analysed the microbiota composition inside the gut and at the gut wall of two different regions in the small intestine, we were surprised – and slightly disappointed – that defensins had only a very minor effect on shaping the overall microbiota composition,” says Björn Schröder.
    However, the intestinal defensins still had some effect directly at the gut wall, where the defensins are produced and secreted. Here, a few distinct bacteria seemed to be affected by the presence of defensins, among them Dubosiella and Bifidobacteria, likely due to selective antimicrobial activity of the defensins.

    “To our surprise, we also found that the combination of eating a Western-style diet and lacking functional defensins led to increased fasting blood glucose values, which indicated that defensins may help to protect against metabolic disorders when eating an unhealthy diet,” says Björn Schröder.
    The results suggest that strategies that aim to positively modulate the microbiota composition should rather focus on diet, as modulation of the composition via increased production of own host defense molecules, such as defensins, may have only a small impact on the overall composition. However, it is possible that especially early in life, when the microbiota community is not fully matured yet, defensins may have a stronger effect on the microbial composition. Still, increasing the production of defensins may be a valuable option to prevent the development of metabolic disorders.

    The results have been published in the scientific journal Microbiology Spectrum.

    Source:
    Journal reference:

    Puértolas-Balint, F., & Schroeder, B. O. (2023). Intestinal α-Defensins Play a Minor Role in Modulating the Small Intestinal Microbiota Composition as Compared to Diet. Microbiology Spectrum. doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00567-23.

    Could COVID-19 Cause Type 1 Diabetes?

    A recently concluded study has revealed that during the initial 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, a higher number of minors in Finland than usual were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. The research findings indicate that the cause of this increase was not the virus itself, but rather changes in environmental factors.

    The global rise in the occurrence of type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic has been the subject of investigation by the PEDIA research group at the University of Helsinki. Their focus has been on exploring the phenomenon and identifying the causes among children in Finland.

    “The mechanisms of the increase in the incidence of diabetes have been unclear, and there has been discussion on whether the increase results from a direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection or other simultaneously altered environmental factors,” says Professor Mikael Knip, who headed the study.

    According to the study, the incidence of type 1 diabetes increased in children in Finland by 16% in the first 18 months of the pandemic. However, very few children or adolescents who developed type 1 diabetes had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies indicating past infection.

    According to the researchers, the increase in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in the early stages of the pandemic is not likely to have been caused directly by coronavirus. Instead, it may be related to the society-wide lockdown during the pandemic period and the resulting social isolation.

    “According to what is known as the biodiversity hypothesis, microbial exposure and infections in early childhood can boost the protection against autoimmune diseases. The reduction in contacts in connection with the societal lockdown significantly reduced acute infections in children, which may have increased the risk of developing diabetes,” Knip explains.

    The results were published in the Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology journal.

    In the study, the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Finns under 15 years of age was compared to three preceding reference periods of the same duration. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in children with type 1 diabetes were analyzed in collaboration with Professor Olli Vapalahti’s research group. Among the 785 children and adolescents diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in the pandemic period, infection-induced SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were found in only five individuals, i..e. less than 1%.

    “The matter must be investigated further to find out what has happened to the incidence of type 1 diabetes since the lifting of the lockdown in summer 2021 and the subsequent increase in the number of coronavirus infections in the population,” Professor Vapalahti notes.

    “The study was based on data from the Finnish Pediatric Diabetes Register,” says Mikael Knip, the Principal Investigator in charge of the register.

    Since 2002, data and samples from the newly diagnosed children and their family members have been collected in this national register. The register, maintained by HUS Helsinki University Hospital, covers more than 90% of the patients who have developed diabetes.

    “The register is globally unique including both data and biological samples and provides irreplaceable data for research,” Knip concludes.

    Reference: “SARS-CoV-2 and type 1 diabetes in children in Finland: an observational study” by Prof Mikael Knip, MD, Anna Parviainen, MD, Maaret Turtinen, MD, Anna But, Ph.D., Taina Härkönen, Ph.D., Jussi Hepojoki, Ph.D., Tarja Sironen, Ph.D., Rommel Iheozor-Ejiofor, MSc, Hasan Uğurlu, MSc, Prof Kalle Saksela, MD, Johanna Lempainen, MD, Prof Jorma Ilonen, MD, Prof Olli Vapalahti, MD and the Finnish Pediatric Diabetes Register, April 2023, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.
    DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00041-4

    COVID-19’s Double Whammy: Cedars-Sinai Investigation Shows Increased Diabetes Risk

    Results also suggest the diabetes risk persists across COVID-19 variants, and that upfront vaccination may help to reduce risk of post-infection diabetes.

    Investigators in the Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai have confirmed that people who have had COVID-19 have an increased risk for new-onset diabetes—the most significant contributor to cardiovascular disease.

    “Our results verify that the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes after a COVID-19 infection was not just an early observation but, in fact, a real risk that has, unfortunately, persisted through the Omicron era,” said Alan Kwan, MD, first and corresponding author of the study and a cardiovascular physician in the Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai.

    The trend, Kwan says, is concerning because most people in the United States will eventually experience a COVID-19 infection. “This research study helps us understand—and better prepare for—the post-COVID-19 era of cardiovascular risk,” Kwan said.

    The findings, published today in the journal JAMA Network Open, also suggest that the risk of Type 2 diabetes appears lower in individuals who were already vaccinated against COVID-19 by the time they were infected.

    To determine the rising rates of diabetes, investigators evaluated medical records from 23,709 adult patients who had at least one documented COVID-19 infection and were treated within the Cedars-Sinai Health System in Los Angeles from 2020-2022. The average patient was 47 years old, and 54% of subjects were female.

    Within the study time frame:

    “These results suggest that COVID-19 vaccination prior to infection may provide a protective effect against diabetes risk,” said Kwan. “Although further studies are needed to validate this hypothesis, we remain steadfast in our belief that COVID-19 vaccination remains an important tool in protecting against COVID-19 and the still-uncertain risks that people may experience during the post-infection period.”

    Susan Cheng, MD, MPH, senior author of the study, professor of Cardiology, and director for Cardiovascular Population Sciences in the Smidt Heart Institute, says these findings broaden the medical field’s understanding of the effects of COVID-19 on the body, while simultaneously unearthing yet-to-be-answered questions.

    “Although we don’t yet know for certain, the trends and patterns that we see in the data suggest that COVID-19 infection could be acting in certain settings like a disease accelerator, amplifying risk for a diagnosis that individuals might have otherwise received later in life,” said Cheng, the Erika J. Glazer Chair in Women’s Cardiovascular Health and Population Science. “So, it could be that instead of being diagnosed with diabetes by age 65, a person with preexisting risk for diabetes might—after a COVID-19 infection—be more likely to develop diabetes by age 45 or 55.”

    Diabetes disrupts normal metabolism and metabolic processes, preventing the pancreas from producing enough insulin, a hormone that helps regulate blood levels of glucose and amino acids. Because diabetes can damage vital organs and blood vessels, people with diabetes are at higher risk for heart attack and stroke.

    The disease affects an estimated 26 million people in the United States.

    This research, Kwan says, is one piece of the puzzle that will help researchers understand how to prevent metabolic as well as cardiovascular disease risk in the future.

    “As we learn how to live with COVID-19, we also have to be prepared to recognize and treat the various conditions linked to its aftereffects,” said Kwan. “Our ultimate goal—with every research study we conduct—is to find ways to keep people healthy and able to engage in their everyday activities and lives.”

    Reference: “Association of COVID-19 Vaccination With Risk for Incident Diabetes After COVID-19 Infection” by Alan C. Kwan, MD, MSc; Joseph E. Ebinger, MD; Patrick Botting, MSPH; Jesse Navarrette, MPA; Brian Claggett, PhD and Susan Cheng, MD, MPH, MMSc, 14 February 2023, JAMA Network Open.
    DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55965

    Study finds sugary beverages increase dementia risk, while natural juices may help prevent it

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileTopLeaderboard) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-top-leaderboard’); });
    }

    In an article published in the journal Current Opinion in Microbiology, scientists have provided a detailed overview of the factors affecting maternal gut microbiota during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and infant health.

    Study: Sugary beverages and genetic risk in relation to brain structure and incident dementia: a prospective cohort study. Image Credit: Africa Studio / ShutterstockStudy: Sugary beverages and genetic risk in relation to brain structure and incident dementia: a prospective cohort study. Image Credit: Africa Studio / Shutterstock

    Background

    Pregnancy is associated with a wide range of hormonal, immunological, and metabolic changes needed for fetal development. The most notable changes include increased cardiac output, higher levels of T regulatory cells, and alteration in gut microbiome composition.

    Alteration in gut microbiota composition and diversity is associated with changes in women’s metabolic, immunological, and neurological processes, irrespective of pregnancy status. In addition, changes in gut microbiota composition are known to affect insulin sensitivity. In children with type 1 diabetes, functional and metabolic changes in gut microbiota have been documented.

    Alteration in gut microbiota during pregnancy

    Only limited evidence is available to thoroughly understand the changes in gut microbiota during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and fetal health. However, according to the available literature, low-grade inflammation at the intestinal mucosa as well as hormonal changes, might be responsible for gut microbiota alteration during pregnancy.

    Regarding hormonal changes, pregnancy-related induction in progesterone levels is known to directly associate with increased Bifidobacterium levels in women. Bifidobacterium is a beneficial bacterium that naturally resides in the intestine. Therefore, the gut-to-gut transmission of this bacterium from the mother to the infant is crucial during the neonatal period. In infants, this bacterium helps degrade human milk oligosaccharides coming from maternal milk, in addition to developing infant gut microbiota and immune system.

    Factors influencing maternal gut microbiota during pregnancy

    Adult human gut microbiota can be influenced by many factors, including body mass index (BMI), medications, diseases, environment, and lifestyle (diet, physical activity, smoking, and drinking habits). Pre-pregnancy exposure to these factors can lead to structural and functional alteration in maternal gut microbiota during pregnancy.

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileMiddleMrec) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-middle-mrec’); });
    }

    Animal studies have shown that maternal diet influences maternal and infant gut microbiota composition before and during pregnancy. Both pre-pregnancy body weight and pregnancy-related weight gain have been found to alter the composition and diversity of maternal gut microbiota.

    Infant gut microbiota are influenced by the way they are delivered. For example, infants delivered vaginally have been shown to gain beneficial changes in gut microbiota compared to those delivered by c-section.

    Functional studies in animals have shown that smoking-related nicotine exposure during pregnancy affects maternal gut microbiota, which in turn alters fetal exposure levels to circulating short-chain fatty acids and leptin during in-utero development.

    Certain diseases before pregnancy, such as inflammatory bowel disease, have been found to influence maternal microbiota during pregnancy. The microbiota of the pregnant mother’s gut has also been shown to be affected pre-pregnancy and during pregnancy by certain medications, including antibiotics, proton-pump inhibitors, metformin, laxatives, and probiotics.

    Maternal health impact of altered gut microbiota

    Studies have found maternal gut microbiota alteration during pregnancy is associated with pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes and preeclampsia.  

    Gestational diabetes

    A spontaneous induction in blood glucose levels during pregnancy is medically termed gestational diabetes. Studies have shown that a reduced abundance of beneficial bacteria and an increased abundance of pathogenic bacteria are responsible for the onset of gestational diabetes.

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileBottomMrec) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-bottom-mrec’); });
    }

    In the microbiome of gestational diabetes patients, an increased abundance of membrane transport, energy metabolism, lipopolysaccharides, and phosphotransferase system pathways has been observed. Recent evidence indicates that gut microbiota-derived dopamine deficiency in the blood, impaired production of short-chain fatty acids, and excessive metabolic inflammation are collectively responsible for the development of gestational diabetes.

    Preeclampsia

    Preeclampsia is characterized by new-onset hypertension, proteinuria, and organ dysfunction during pregnancy. Studies involving pregnant women with preeclampsia have found gut microbiota dysbiosis (imbalance in gut microbiota composition) and increased plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide and trimethylamine N-oxide.

    Recent evidence indicates that preeclampsia onset is associated with reduced bacterial diversity in gut microbiota. Specifically, the changes in gut microbiota include a depletion in beneficial bacteria and an enrichment in opportunistic bacteria.

    Some mechanistic studies have pointed out that gut microbiota dysbiosis induces immune imbalance and intestinal barrier disruption in pregnant women, leading to the translocation of bacteria to the intrauterine cavity, placental inflammation, and poor placentation. All these factors collectively contribute to the development of preeclampsia.

    Infant health impact of altered gut microbiota

    Alteration in maternal gut microbiota has been found to affect the fetus’s neurodevelopment via signaling microbially modulated metabolites to neurons in the developing brain. These changes can have long-term effects on an infant’s behaviors.

    Maternal microbiota-derived metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids are known to shape the metabolic system of infants. Some evidence has also indicated that maternal gut microbiota influences an infant’s susceptibility to allergic diseases.

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileBottomLeaderboard) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-bottom-leaderboard’); });
    }

    Journal reference:

    Factors shaping maternal gut microbiome during pregnancy and the impact on infant health

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileTopLeaderboard) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-top-leaderboard’); });
    }

    In an article published in the journal Current Opinion in Microbiology, scientists have provided a detailed overview of the factors affecting maternal gut microbiota during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and infant health.

    Study: The maternal gut microbiome during pregnancy and its role in maternal and infant health. Image Credit: Design_Cells / ShutterstockStudy: The maternal gut microbiome during pregnancy and its role in maternal and infant health. Image Credit: Design_Cells / Shutterstock

    Background

    Pregnancy is associated with a wide range of hormonal, immunological, and metabolic changes needed for fetal development. The most notable changes include increased cardiac output, higher levels of T regulatory cells, and alteration in gut microbiome composition.

    Alteration in gut microbiota composition and diversity is associated with changes in women’s metabolic, immunological, and neurological processes, irrespective of pregnancy status. In addition, changes in gut microbiota composition are known to affect insulin sensitivity. In children with type 1 diabetes, functional and metabolic changes in gut microbiota have been documented.

    Alteration in gut microbiota during pregnancy

    Only limited evidence is available to thoroughly understand the changes in gut microbiota during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and fetal health. However, according to the available literature, low-grade inflammation at the intestinal mucosa as well as hormonal changes, might be responsible for gut microbiota alteration during pregnancy.

    Regarding hormonal changes, pregnancy-related induction in progesterone levels is known to directly associate with increased Bifidobacterium levels in women. Bifidobacterium is a beneficial bacterium that naturally resides in the intestine. Therefore, the gut-to-gut transmission of this bacterium from the mother to the infant is crucial during the neonatal period. In infants, this bacterium helps degrade human milk oligosaccharides coming from maternal milk, in addition to developing infant gut microbiota and immune system.

    Factors influencing maternal gut microbiota during pregnancy

    Adult human gut microbiota can be influenced by many factors, including body mass index (BMI), medications, diseases, environment, and lifestyle (diet, physical activity, smoking, and drinking habits). Pre-pregnancy exposure to these factors can lead to structural and functional alteration in maternal gut microbiota during pregnancy.

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileMiddleMrec) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-middle-mrec’); });
    }

    Animal studies have shown that maternal diet influences maternal and infant gut microbiota composition before and during pregnancy. Both pre-pregnancy body weight and pregnancy-related weight gain have been found to alter the composition and diversity of maternal gut microbiota.

    Mode of delivery has been found to influence infant gut microbiota. For example, infants delivered vaginally have been shown to gain beneficial changes in gut microbiota compared to those delivered by c-section.

    Functional studies in animals have shown that smoking-related nicotine exposure during pregnancy affects maternal gut microbiota, which in turn alters fetal exposure levels to circulating short-chain fatty acids and leptin during in-utero development.

    Certain diseases before pregnancy, such as inflammatory bowel disease, have been found to influence maternal microbiota during pregnancy. Similarly, pre-pregnancy and during-pregnancy consumption of certain medications, including antibiotics, proton-pump inhibitors, metformin, laxatives, and probiotics, has been found to influence maternal gut microbiota during pregnancy.

    Maternal health impact of altered gut microbiota

    Studies have found maternal gut microbiota alteration during pregnancy is associated with pregnancy complications, including gestational diabetes and preeclampsia.  

    Gestational diabetes

    A spontaneous induction in blood glucose levels during pregnancy is medically termed gestational diabetes. Studies have shown that a reduced abundance of beneficial bacteria and an increased abundance of pathogenic bacteria are responsible for the onset of gestational diabetes.

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileBottomMrec) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-bottom-mrec’); });
    }

    In the microbiome of gestational diabetes patients, an increased abundance of membrane transport, energy metabolism, lipopolysaccharides, and phosphotransferase system pathways has been observed. Recent evidence indicates that gut microbiota-derived dopamine deficiency in the blood, impaired production of short-chain fatty acids, and excessive metabolic inflammation are collectively responsible for the development of gestational diabetes.

    Preeclampsia

    Preeclampsia is characterized by new-onset hypertension, proteinuria, and organ dysfunction during pregnancy. Studies involving pregnant women with preeclampsia have found gut microbiota dysbiosis (imbalance in gut microbiota composition) and increased plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide and trimethylamine N-oxide.

    Recent evidence indicates that preeclampsia onset is associated with reduced bacterial diversity in gut microbiota. Specifically, the changes in gut microbiota include a depletion in beneficial bacteria and an enrichment in opportunistic bacteria.

    Some mechanistic studies have pointed out that gut microbiota dysbiosis induces immune imbalance and intestinal barrier disruption in pregnant women, leading to the translocation of bacteria to the intrauterine cavity, placental inflammation, and poor placentation. All these factors collectively contribute to the development of preeclampsia.

    Infant health impact of altered gut microbiota

    Alteration in maternal gut microbiota has been found to affect the fetus’s neurodevelopment via signaling microbially modulated metabolites to neurons in the developing brain. These changes can have long-term effects on an infant’s behaviors.

    Maternal microbiota-derived metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids are known to shape the metabolic system of infants. Some evidence has also indicated that maternal gut microbiota influences an infant’s susceptibility to allergic diseases.

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileBottomLeaderboard) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-bottom-leaderboard’); });
    }

    Journal reference:

    Study expands the knowledge about gut viral diversity in healthy infants

    Viruses are usually associated with illness. But our bodies are full of both bacteria and viruses that constantly proliferate and interact with each other in our gastrointestinal tract. While we have known for decades that gut bacteria in young children are vital to protect them from chronic diseases later on in life, our knowledge about the many viruses found there is minimal.

    A few years back, this gave University of Copenhagen professor Dennis Sandris Nielsen the idea to delve more deeply into this question. As a result, a team of researchers from COPSAC (Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood) and the Department of Food Science at UCPH, among others, spent five years studying and mapping the diaper contents of 647 healthy Danish one-year-olds.

    “We found an exceptional number of unknown viruses in the feces of these babies. Not just thousands of new virus species – but to our surprise, the viruses represented more than 200 families of yet to be described viruses. This means that, from early on in life, healthy children are tumbling about with an extreme diversity of gut viruses, which probably have a major impact on whether they develop various diseases later on in life,” says Professor Dennis Sandris Nielsen of the Department of Food Science, senior author of the research paper about the study, now published in Nature Microbiology.

    The researchers found and mapped a total of 10,000 viral species in the children’s feces – a number ten times larger than the number of bacterial species in the same children. These viral species are distributed across 248 different viral families, of which only 16 were previously known. The researchers named the remaining 232 unknown viral families after the children whose diapers made the study possible. As a result, new viral families include names like Sylvesterviridae, Rigmorviridae and Tristanviridae.

    Bacterial viruses are our allies

    This is the first time that such a systematic an overview of gut viral diversity has been compiled. It provides an entirely new basis for discovering the importance of viruses for our microbiome and immune system development. Our hypothesis is that, because the immune system has not yet learned to separate the wheat from the chaff at the age of one, an extraordinarily high species richness of gut viruses emerges, and is likely needed to protect against chronic diseases like asthma and diabetes later on in life.”

    Shiraz Shah, first author and senior researcher at COPSAC

    Ninety percent of the viruses found by the researchers are bacterial viruses – known as bacteriophages. These viruses have bacteria as their hosts and do not attack the children’s own cells, meaning that they do not cause disease. The hypothesis is that bacteriophages primarily serve as allies:

    “We work from the assumption that bacteriophages are largely responsible for shaping bacterial communities and their function in our intestinal system. Some bacteriophages can provide their host bacterium with properties that make it more competitive by integrating its own genome into the genome of the bacterium. When this occurs, a bacteriophage can then increase a bacterium’s ability to absorb e.g. various carbohydrates, thereby allowing the bacterium to metabolize more things,” explains Dennis Sandris Nielsen, who continues:

    “It also seems like bacteriophages help keep the gut microbiome balanced by keeping individual bacterial populations in check, which ensures that there are not too many of a single bacterial species in the ecosystem. It’s a bit like lion and gazelle populations on the savannah.”

    if (g_displayableSlots.mobileMiddleMrec) {
    pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-middle-mrec’); });
    }

    Shiraz Shah adds:

    “Previously, the research community mostly focused on the role of bacteria in relation to health and disease. But viruses are the third leg of the stool and we need to learn more about them. Viruses, bacteria and the immune system most likely interact and affect each other in some type of balance. Any imbalance in this relationship most likely increases the risk of chronic disease.”

    The remaining ten percent of viruses found in the children are eukaryotic – that is, they use human cells as hosts. These can be both friends and foes for us:

    “It is thought-provoking that all children run around with 10-20 of these virus types that infect human cells. So, there is a constant viral infection taking place, which apparently doesn’t make them sick. We just know very little about what’s really at play. My guess is that they’re important for training our immune system to recognise infections later. But it may also be that they are a risk factor for diseases that we have yet to discover,” says Dennis Sandris Nielsen.

    Could play an important role in inflammatory diseases

    The researchers have yet to discover where the many viruses in the one-year-olds come from. Their best answer thus far is the environment:

    “Our gut is sterile until we are born. During birth, we are exposed to bacteria from the mother and environment. It is likely that some of the first viruses come along with these initial bacteria, while many others are introduced later via dirty fingers, pets, dirt that kids put in their mouths and other things in the environment,” says Dennis Sandris Nielsen.

    As Shiraz Shah points out, the entire field of research speaks to a huge global health problem:

    “A lot of research suggests that the majority of chronic diseases that we’re familiar with – from arthritis to depression – have an inflammatory component. That is, the immune system is not working as it ought to – which might be because it wasn’t trained properly. So, if we learn more about the role that bacteria and viruses play in a well-trained immune system, it can hopefully lead us to being able to avoid many of the chronic diseases that afflict so many people today.”

    The research groups have begun investigating the role of gut viruses in relation to a number of different diseases that occur in childhood, such as asthma and ADHD.

    Source:
    Journal reference:

    Shah, S. A., et al. (2023). Expanding known viral diversity in the healthy infant gut. Nature Microbiology. doi.org/10.1038/s41564-023-01345-7.

    Research finds SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant to be more fatal than seasonal influenza

    Adults hospitalized with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant have a higher death rate than those hospitalized with seasonal influenza, even though Omicron is considered less virulent with lower case fatality rates than the delta and alpha strains, new research being presented at this year’s European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) in Copenhagen, Denmark (15-18 April) suggests.

    The study by Dr Alaa Atamna and colleagues from the Rabin Medical Center at Belinison Hospital in Israel found that adults (18 years or older) hospitalized with influenza were 55% less likely to die within 30 days than those hospitalized with Omicron during the 2021-2022 influenza season.

    Influenza and COVID-19 are both respiratory diseases with similar modes of transmission. In December 2021, influenza re-emerged in Israel after it went undetected since March 2020. At the same time, the Omicron had substituted Delta as the predominant variant. But data directly comparing Omicron with seasonal influenza are scarce.

    To find out more, researchers compared the clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (Omicron variant) and those hospitalized with influenza at a large academic hospital in Israel.

    Consecutive patients hospitalized with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 (167 patients; average age 71 years, 58% male) and influenza infection (221 patients; average age 65 years, 41% male) during December 2021 and January 2022 were included in the study.

    Overall, 63 patients died within 30 days-;19 (9%) admitted with influenza and 44 (26%) hospitalized with Omicron.

    Patients with Omicron tended to have higher overall comorbidity scores, needed more assistance performing activities of daily living (e.g., washing and dressing), and were more likely to have high blood pressure and diabetes, whereas asthma was more common in those hospitalized with influenza (see table 1 in notes to editors).

    Respiratory complications and need for oxygen support and mechanical ventilation were also more common in Omicron cases than in seasonal influenza.

    A possible reason for the higher Omicron death rate is that patients admitted with Omicron were older with additional major underlying illnesses such as diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The difference might also be due to an exaggerated immune response in COVID-19, and that vaccination against COVID-19 was far lower among patients with Omicron.”

    Dr Alaa Atamna, Rabin Medical Center at Belinison Hospital in Israel

    He continues, “The double whammy of overlapping influenza and COVID-19 epidemics will increase the complexity of disease and the burden on health systems. There is one basic step people can take that may alter the trajectory of either epidemic, get the vaccines for flu and COVID-19, especially if you are older and have underlying illnesses.”

    The authors point out that the study was observational so can’t prove causation, and it was conducted in one hospital in Israel so the results may not apply to other countries and populations. And they cannot rule out the possibility that other unmeasured factors such as influenza and COVID19 vaccination status may have influenced the results. They also note that the excess mortality observed for Omicron could be the result of an influenza season that was less severe than usual. Finally, the study included only hospitalized patients, so could not estimate the proportion of hospitalized patients in the total number of infected patients.