Tag Archives: immunization

A creative new approach to make vaccine against norovirus

if (g_displayableSlots.mobileTopLeaderboard) {
pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-top-leaderboard’); });
}

Every year, norovirus causes hundreds of millions of cases of food poisoning -; and the deaths of at least 50,000 children -; yet there exists no real way to control it. The virus has proven exceptionally difficult to study in the lab, and scientists have struggled to develop effective vaccines and drugs.

A new study at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis describes a creative way to make a vaccine against norovirus by piggybacking on the highly effective vaccines for rotavirus, an unrelated virus that also causes diarrhea.

The researchers created an experimental rotavirus-norovirus combo vaccine by adding a key protein from norovirus to a harmless strain of rotavirus. Mice that received the experimental vaccine produced neutralizing antibodies against both rotavirus and norovirus. The study, available online in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, outlines an innovative approach to preventing one of the most common and intractable viral infections.

Pretty much everyone has had norovirus at some point. You go out to eat, and the next thing you know you’re vomiting and having diarrhea. You will recover, but it’s going to be a rough three days or so. For kids in the developing world who don’t have access to clean water, though, it can be deadly. The rotavirus vaccines work really well, and there are already global distribution systems set up for them, so based on that, we saw an opportunity to finally make some headway against norovirus.”

Siyuan Ding, PhD, senior author, assistant professor of molecular microbiology

Before the first rotavirus vaccines were rolled out in 2006, half a million children around the world died every year of diarrhea caused by rotavirus infection. Now, the number is estimated to be about 200,000 -; still high but a huge improvement. Four rotavirus vaccines are in use around the world. All are live-virus vaccines, meaning they are based on weakened forms of rotavirus capable of triggering an immune response but not of making people sick.

Human norovirus, on the other hand, has stymied scientific investigation for decades. It doesn’t infect mice or rats or any other ordinary lab animals, so the kinds of experiments that led to the development of rotavirus vaccines have been impossible to replicate with norovirus.

Ding and colleagues -; including first author Takahiro Kawagishi, PhD, a staff scientist in Ding’s lab, and co-corresponding author Harry B. Greenberg, MD, a professor emeritus of medicine at Stanford University -; came up with the idea of using rotavirus to bypass the technical difficulties of working with norovirus. They worked with a laboratory strain of rotavirus as a stand-in for one of the approved rotavirus vaccines, which are proprietary.

if (g_displayableSlots.mobileMiddleMrec) {
pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-middle-mrec’); });
}

The researchers inserted the gene for the protein that forms the outer surface of human norovirus into the genome of the rotavirus lab strain. Then, they administered the modified rotavirus to immunocompromised infant mice by mouth, the same way rotavirus vaccines are given to children. They took blood and fecal samples four, six and eight weeks later. Nine weeks after the initial immunization, the researchers gave the mice a booster by injection and took samples again a week later.

A strong antibody response was evident in the blood of nine of 11 mice tested, and in the intestines of all 11 mice. Even better, some of the antibodies from the blood and the intestines were able to neutralize both viruses in human “mini-gut” cultures in a dish. Such cultures, also known as organoids, are grown from human stem cells and replicate the surface of the human gut.

“Traditionally, vaccine studies have focused on the antibody response in the blood, because we understand that part of the immune response the best,” Ding said. “But norovirus and rotavirus are gut viruses, so antibodies in the blood are less important than the ones in the intestines in terms of fighting off these viruses. The fact that we saw a strong antibody response in the intestines is a good sign.”

The next step is to show that animals immunized with the experimental vaccine are less likely to get sick or die from norovirus. Ding has such experiments underway.

The power of this study is that it outlines a novel approach that could accelerate vaccine development for a variety of troublesome organisms that cause diarrhea, especially in resource-limited countries where many of these infections occur.

“There are a lot of intestinal pathogens out there for which we don’t have good treatments or vaccines,” Ding said. “In principle, we could put a gene from any organism that infects the intestinal tract into the rotavirus vaccine to create a bivalent vaccine. We’d have to find the right targets to produce a good immune response, of course, but the principle is simple.

“As basic scientists, we rarely get the chance to actually move something forward into the clinic,” Ding continued. “We study what the virus does and how the host responds at a basic level. This is a rare opportunity for our work to affect human health directly and make people’s lives better.”

if (g_displayableSlots.mobileBottomLeaderboard) {
pushDisplayAd(function() { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-mobile-bottom-leaderboard’); });
}

Source:
Journal reference:

Kawagishi, T., et al. (2023). Mucosal and systemic neutralizing antibodies to norovirus induced in infant mice orally inoculated with recombinant rotaviruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214421120.

Novel subset of memory B cells predicts long-lived antibody responses to influenza vaccination

Memory B cells play a critical role to provide long-term immunity after a vaccination or infection. In a study published in the journal Immunity, researchers describe a distinct and novel subset of memory B cells that predict long-lived antibody responses to influenza vaccination in humans.

These effector memory B cells appear to be poised for a rapid serum antibody response upon secondary challenge one year later, Anoma Nellore, M.D., Fran Lund, Ph.D., and colleagues at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and Emory University report. Evidence from transcriptional and epigenetic profiling shows that the cells in this subset differ from all previously described memory B cell subsets.

The UAB researchers identified the novel subset by the presence of FcRL5 receptor protein on the cell surface. In immunology, a profusion of different cell-surface markers is used to identify and separate immune-cell types. In the novel memory B cell subset, FcRL5 acts as a surrogate marker for positive expression of the T-bet transcription factor inside the cells. Various transcription factors act as master regulators to orchestrate the expression of many different gene sets as various cell types grow and differentiate.

Nellore, Lund and colleagues found that the FcRL5+ T-bet+ memory B cells can be detected seven days after immunization, and the presence of these cells correlates with vaccine antibody responses months later. Thus, these cells may represent an early, easily monitored cellular compartment that can predict the development of a long-lived antibody response to vaccines.

This could be a boon to the development of a more effective yearly influenza vaccine. “New annual influenza vaccines must be tested, and then manufactured, months in advance of the winter flu season,” Lund said. “This means we must make an educated guess as to which flu strain will be circulating the next winter.”

Why are vaccine candidates made so far in advance? Pharmaceutical companies, Lund says, need to wait many weeks after vaccinating volunteers to learn whether the new vaccine elicits a durable immune response that will last for months. “One potential outcome of the current study is we may have identified a new way to predict influenza vaccine durability that would give us an answer in days, rather than weeks or months,” Lund said. “If so, this type of early ‘biomarker’ could be used to test flu vaccines closer to flu season -; and moving that timeline might give us a better shot at predicting the right flu strain for the new annual vaccine.”

Seasonal flu kills 290,000 to 650,000 people each year, according to World Health Organization estimates. The global flu vaccine market was more than $5 billion in 2020.

To understand the Immunity study, it is useful to remember what happens when a vaccinated person subsequently encounters a flu virus.

Following exposure to previously encountered antigens, such as the hemagglutinin on inactivated influenza in flu vaccines, the immune system launches a recall response dominated by pre-existing memory B cells that can either produce new daughter cells or cells that can rapidly proliferate and differentiate into short-lived plasmablasts that produce antibodies to decrease morbidity and mortality. These latter B cells are called “effector” memory B cells.

“The best vaccines induce the formation of long-lived plasma cells and memory B cells,” said Lund, the Charles H. McCauley Professor in the UAB Department of Microbiology and director of the Immunology Institute. “Plasma cells live in your bone marrow and make protective antibodies that can be found in your blood, while memory B cells live for many years in your lymph nodes and in tissues like your lungs.

“Although plasma cells can survive for decades after vaccines like the measles vaccine, other plasma cells wane much more quickly after vaccination, as is seen with COVID-19,” Lund said. “If that happens, memory B cells become very important because these long-lived cells can rapidly respond to infection and can quickly begin making antibody.”

In the study, the UAB researchers looked at B cells isolated from blood of human volunteers who received flu vaccines over a span of three years, as well as B cells from tonsil tissue obtained after tonsillectomies.

They compared naïve B cells, FcRL5+ T-bet+ hemagglutinin-specific memory B cells, FcRL5neg T-betneg hemagglutinin-specific memory B cells and antibody secreting B cells, using standard phenotype profiling and single-cell RNA sequencing. They found that the FcRL5+ T-bet+ hemagglutinin-specific memory B cells were transcriptionally similar to effector-like memory cells, while the FcRL5neg T-betneg hemagglutinin-specific memory B cells exhibited stem-like central memory properties.

Antibody-secreting B cells need to produce a lot of energy to churn out antibody production, and they also must turn on processes that protect the cells from some of the detrimental side effects of that intense metabolism, including controlling the dangerous reactive oxygen species and boosting the unfolded protein response.

The FcRL5+ T-bet+ hemagglutinin-specific memory B cells did not express the plasma cell commitment factor, but did express transcriptional, epigenetic and metabolic functional programs that poised these cells for antibody production. These included upregulated genes for energy-intensive metabolic processes and cellular stress responses.

Accordingly, FcRL5+ T-bet+ hemagglutinin-specific memory B cells at Day 7 post-vaccination expressed intracellular immunoglobulin, a sign of early transition to antibody-secreting cells. Furthermore, human tonsil-derived FcRL5+ T-bet+ memory B differentiated more rapidly into antibody-secreting cells in vitro than did FcRL5neg T-betneg hemagglutinin-specific memory B cells.

Lund and Nellore, an associate professor in the UAB Department of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases, are co-corresponding authors of the study, “A transcriptionally distinct subset of influenza-specific effector memory B cells predicts long-lived antibody responses to vaccination in humans.”

Co-authors with Lund and Nellore are Esther Zumaquero, R. Glenn King, Betty Mousseau, Fen Zhou and Alexander F. Rosenberg, UAB Department of Microbiology; Christopher D. Scharer, Tian Mi, Jeremy M. Boss, Christopher M. Tipton and Ignacio Sanz, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Christopher F. Fucile, UAB Informatics Institute; John E. Bradley and Troy D. Randall, UAB Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology; and Stuti Mutneja and Paul A. Goepfert, UAB Department of Medicine Division of Infectious Diseases.

Funding for the work came from National Institutes of Health grants AI125180, AI109962 and AI142737 and from the UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science.

Source:
Journal reference:

Nellore, A., et al. (2023). A transcriptionally distinct subset of influenza-specific effector memory B cells predicts long-lived antibody responses to vaccination in humans. Immunity. doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2023.03.001.

New SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 variant has high transmissibility and infectivity, study finds

COVID-19 has caused significant global panic after its rapid emergence more than 3 years ago. Although we now have highly effective vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, scientists continue to study emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants in order to safeguard public health and devise global preventive strategies against emerging variants. A team led by Japanese researchers has recently discovered that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 variant, prevalent in the Western hemisphere, has high transmissibility and infectivity.

New SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 variant has high transmissibility and infectivity, study finds
New SARS-CoV-2 variant may jeopardize public health across the globe. The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 variant spreads rapidly and is more infectious than its historic precursor. Image Credit: The University of Tokyo

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been responsible for millions of deaths worldwide. Although scientists have designed novel vaccines to counter COVID-19, they are constantly on the lookout for emerging variants that can bypass vaccine resistance and potentially jeopardize global public health. A team led by Japanese researchers has recently been successful in characterizing the new SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 variant, which was first detected in October 2022. Their findings were published on January 31, 2023 in volume 23 of The Lancet Infectious Diseases.​​​

Says senior author Prof. Kei Sato from the Division of Systems Virology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Japan, “Because the Omicron XBB.1.5 variant can spread more rapidly than previous variants and has a potential to cause the next epidemic surge, we should carefully monitor it to safeguard public health.”

While studying emerging variants of the SARs-CoV-2 Omicron lineage, the research team made a startling discovery: the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 variant has a novel mutation in the spike (S) protein—the protein that anchors the virus firmly to the human angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor, thus facilitating the invasion of human cells. The serine-to-proline amino acid mutation noted at residue no. 486 in the S protein is virologically concerning because of a variety of reasons.

Sharing his concerns, first author Keiya Uriu from the Division of Systems Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Tokyo, Japan, says, “In late 2022, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BQ.1 and XBB lineages, characterized by amino acid substitutions in the S protein and increased viral fitness, had become predominant in the Western and Eastern Hemisphere, respectively. In 2022, we elucidated the characteristics of a variety of newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants. At the end of 2022, the XBB.1.5 variant, a descendant of XBB.1 that acquired the S:S486P substitution, emerged and was rapidly spreading in the USA.”

To gain mechanistic insights into the infectivity, transmissibility, and immune response associated with XBB.1.5, the team conducted a series of experiments. For instance, upon conducting epidemic dynamics analysis—statistical modeling that facilitates the analysis of the general characteristics of any epidemic—the team realized that the relative effective reproduction number (Re) of XBB.1.5 was 1.2-fold greater than that of the parental XBB.1. This indicated that an individual with the XBB.1.5 variant could infect 1.2 times more people in the population than someone with the parental XBB.1 variant. Moreover, the team also realized that, as of December 2022, XBB.1.5 was rapidly outcompeting BQ.1.1, the predominant lineage in the United States.

Co-first-author Jumpei Ito from the Division of Systems Virology, remarks, “Our data suggest that XBB.1.5 will rapidly spread worldwide in the near future.”

The team also studied the virological features of XBB.1.5 to determine how tightly the S protein of the new variant interacts with the human ACE2 receptor. To this end, the researchers conducted a yeast surface display assay. The results showed that the dissociation constant (KD) corresponding to the physical interaction between the XBB.1.5 S receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the human ACE2 receptor is significantly (4.3-fold) lower than that for XBB.1 S RBD. “In other words, the XBB.1.5 variant binds to human ACE2 receptor with very high affinity,” explains Shigeru Fujita from the Division of Systems Virology.

Further experiments using lentivirus-based pseudoviruses also showed that XBB.1.5 had approximately 3-fold higher infectivity than XBB.1. These results suggest that XBB.1.5 exhibits a remarkably strong affinity to the human ACE2 receptor, which can be attributed to the S486P substitution.

The study by Prof. Sato and his team led to another important discovery from an immunization perspective. The XBB.1.5 S protein was found to be highly resistant to neutralization antibodies elicited by breakthrough infection with the BA.2/BA.5 subvariants. In other words, patients with prior infection from the BA.2/BA.5 subvariants may not show robust immunity against XBB.1.5, increasing their chances of infection and disease.

The results of our virological experiments explain why the Omicron XBB.1.5 variant has a higher transmissibility than past variants: This variant acquired strong binding ability to human ACE2 while maintaining a higher ability to escape from neutralizing antibodies.”

​​​​​​​Yusuke Kosugi, Division of Systems Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Tokyo, Japan

Contributing members of The Genotype to Phenotype Japan (G2P-Japan) Consortium conclude, “The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 variant does show enhanced transmissibility. Although few cases have been detected in the Eastern hemisphere, it could become a looming threat. Imminent prevention measures are needed.”

​​​​​​​Thanks to the research team for the early warning! Meanwhile, we must continue adopting safe practices to defend ourselves from XBB.1.5. 

Source:
Journal reference:

Uriu, K., et al. (2023) Enhanced transmissibility, infectivity, and immune resistance of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron XBB.1.5 variant. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00051-8.

First clinical trial of GABA/GAD focused exclusively on children with recent onset Type 1 diabetes

For the first time, humans with newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes, or T1D, have received two treatments called GABA and GAD that have shown promise in animal studies and in isolated human pancreas islets. This investigator-initiated clinical trial, published in Nature Communications, focused exclusively on children with recent onset T1D.

Diabetes is a disease affecting two pancreatic hormones -; insulin and glucagon. In healthy people, insulin helps cells take up glucose from the blood when glucose levels are high. In contrast, glucagon helps the liver release glucose into the bloodstream when glucose levels are low. Thus, levels of blood glucose remain steady.

In T1D, autoantibodies destroy the pancreatic beta cells, insulin release is diminished, and glucagon release is excessive relative to the insulin deficiency. This can cause a vicious cycle of escalating blood glucose levels. Strategies to ameliorate or cure T1D, therefore, target the preservation of insulin-secreting beta cells and/or attenuation of the relative excess of alpha cell glucagon. Most importantly, concerning the inhibition of alpha cell glucagon in this trial by GABA/GAD, recent studies in animals made diabetic have shown that inhibition of glucagon leads to expansion of insulin-secreting beta cells and improvements in hyperglycemia.

Researchers in the study, led by University of Alabama at Birmingham physicians, were able to enroll children within the first five weeks of diagnosis, before the near total eradication of beta cells. Forty percent of the study participants were younger than 10 years old. The study -; which was constrained to lower-dose GABA therapy by the United States Food and Drug Administration because it was the first human trial with GABA -; did not achieve its primary outcome, the preservation of insulin production by beta cells. However, it did meet the clinically relevant secondary outcome of reduced serum glucagon. Significantly, the trial confirmed the safety and tolerability of oral GABA. Additionally, in collaboration with the immunology team of Hubert Tse, Ph.D., at the UAB Comprehensive Diabetes Center, a separate manuscript under review will describe a salutary effect of GABA alone and in combination with GAD on cytokine responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from trial participants.

GABA is gamma aminobutyric acid, a major inhibitory neurotransmitter. In the endocrine pancreas, GABA participates in paracrine regulation -; meaning a hormone that acts on nearby cells -; on the beta cells that produce insulin and the alpha cells that produce glucagon. In various mouse model studies, GABA was able to delay diabetes onset, and restore normal blood glucose levels after diabetes had already commenced. GABA treatment also led to significant decreases in the inflammatory cytokine expression that participates in the pathogenesis of T1D.

GAD is glutamic acid decarboxylase, the enzyme that acts on glutamate to form GABA. Animal and pancreatic islet cell studies show that immunization with GAD alone may help preserve beta cells. Both GABA and GAD are highly concentrated in the pancreatic islet, which is the autoimmune target of T1D.

The study, which was conducted between March 2015 and June 2019, screened 350 patients and enrolled 97, whose ages averaged 11 years. Forty-one took oral GABA twice a day; 25 took the oral GABA in combination with two injections of GAD, one at the baseline visit and one at the one-month visit. The remaining 31 children received a placebo treatment. Analysis after one year of treatment included 39 in the GABA group, 22 in the GABA/GAD group and 30 in the placebo group.

Given that GABA reduces immune inflammation at higher doses in several diabetic rodent models, it is plausible that increased GABA doses, or longer-acting preparations, could offer sufficiently prolonged, above-threshold GABA concentrations to preserve islet cells, particularly during stage 1 diabetes.”

Gail Mick, M.D., UAB Professor in the Department of Pediatrics’ Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes

Mick and Kenneth McCormick, M.D., who recently retired from UAB Pediatrics, co-led the trial.

Alexandra Martin and Mick, UAB Department of Pediatrics, are co-first authors of the study, “A randomized trial of oral gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) or the combination of GABA with glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) on pancreatic islet endocrine function in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.”

Other authors are Heather M. Choat, Alison A. Lunsford and Kenneth L. McCormick, UAB Department of Pediatrics; Hubert M. Tse, UAB Department of Microbiology; and Gerald G. McGwin Jr., Department of Epidemiology, UAB School of Public Health.

Source:
Journal reference:

Martin, A., et al. (2022) A randomized trial of oral gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) or the combination of GABA with glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) on pancreatic islet endocrine function in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Nature Communications. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35544-3.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes of women infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the Omicron wave in Italy

In a recent study published in the Clinical Microbiology and Infection, researchers assessed the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination on pregnant women during the Omicron wave.

Study: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy during the Omicron wave: the prospective cohort study of the Italian obstetric surveillance system. Image Credit: GolF2532/Shutterstock
Study: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnancy during the Omicron wave: the prospective cohort study of the Italian obstetric surveillance system. Image Credit: GolF2532/Shutterstock

Background

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, pregnant women were more likely than the general population to develop severe COVID-19. In utero mother-to-child viral transmission was shown to be uncommon, and infected mothers demonstrated a strong immune response with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies passed on to newborns.

Despite many studies indicating a substantial maternal antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 immunization and the absence of safety issues, the vaccination rate among pregnant women remained lower than that of the general population. Only a few studies have been undertaken to date on the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant on unvaccinated and vaccinated pregnant women.

About the study

In the present study, researchers compared the perinatal and maternal outcomes of SARS-CoV-2-infected women in Italy during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant wave based on their vaccination protection.

The current national prospective cohort research involved pregnant women who tested COVID-19-positive within seven days of hospitalization in any Italian maternity unit between January 1 and May 31 2022. In addition, women reported whether they had received the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, as well as the when (before and/or at the time of pregnancy) and how many doses were received.

The primary outcome measure was SARS-CoV-2 disease severity, classified as mild, moderate, or severe. The two most severe severity categories, determined by pneumonia diagnosis, were grouped together for statistical analysis as “moderate or severe COVID-19 disease” (MSCD). Secondary outcomes comprised preterm birth, stillbirth, delivery mode, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and early neonatal mortality before hospital release.

MSCD protection was taken into account as an exposure variable. Women vaccinated with a minimum of one vaccine dose at the time of pregnancy, and those vaccinated with the full vaccine schedule and the first booster vaccine were protected against MSCD. On the other hand, unvaccinated women and participants who were vaccinated with either one or two vaccine doses prior to pregnancy and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at 22 or more gestational weeks were deemed unprotected. Women with incomplete vaccination information and those who were vaccinated with one or two doses prior to pregnancy and who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at less than 22 gestational weeks were deemed “unknown in terms of protective status.”

Results

Between January 1 and May 31, 2022, a total of 2,774 women who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within seven days of hospitalization were enrolled. Information was available about the protection status of 2147 women, while no significant clinical or socio-demographic variations were noted between these women and the entire cohort.

According to the study’s definition, almost 1,069 (49.8%) individuals were protected against MSCD. Of them, 74 were vaccinated with one vaccine during pregnancy, while 596 received two, including a minimum of one dose administered during pregnancy, while 327 received their first booster. In contrast, 1,078 women were deemed unprotected, including 989 women who were unvaccinated and 89 who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at 22 or more weeks of gestation after receiving one or two doses before pregnancy. All except 26 women were immunized with the conventional vaccinations alone or in conjunction with messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines.

Compared to protected women, unprotected women displayed a higher likelihood of being younger, less educated, of foreign nationality, and symptomatic. Also, 96.4% were hospitalized for childbirth or obstetrical causes, whereas 3.6% were hospitalized due to COVID-19. Eight of the latter acquired severe disease, 12 developed a moderate disease, and 58 developed a mild disease.

MSCD illness was uncommon overall but more prevalent among unprotected women than among protected women. Among the 41 MSCD cases, 27 of 29 unprotected women had not received any vaccine, while two were vaccinated with two doses prior to pregnancy. Three of the 12 protected women received the booster, while nine received two doses, among which the first was received before and the second was received during pregnancy.

Among unprotected women, seven out of eight severe infection cases and one maternal fatality occurred. COVID-19 pneumonia was deemed the cause of death, reported two weeks after delivery. Unprotected women had a greater incidence of MSCD compared to protected women, Asian women, and those with a history of comorbidities.

Sensitivity analysis revealed that unprotected women had considerably higher MSCD risk than protected women. Furthermore, 8.7% of newborns were born preterm, predominantly late preterm, with no significant variations between unprotected and protected women, but C-section was reported in 34.4% and 29.3% of women, respectively. The rate of preterm birth was greater among MSCD-infected women compared to those with milder cases and those with CS. Also, out of 619 CS cases, five were urgent/emergent due to COVID-19, and all involved MSCD-affected women.

Conclusion

Overall, the study findings documented a low prevalence of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women and considerable efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in providing protection. These statistics can serve as the foundation for informing pregnant women uncertain about the vaccine’s efficacy and demonstrating the importance of vaccination in protecting their newborns.

Journal reference: